The 10 Best OCR Software Options for 2026

Stop Drowning in Paperwork: Your Guide to Smarter OCR

That growing pile of receipts, invoices, and contracts isn’t just clutter. It’s a bottleneck. Every minute you spend typing figures from a faded till slip into Xero, checking whether a supplier invoice total was entered correctly, or hunting through email attachments is time you’re not spending on billable work, clients, or cash flow.

That’s where the best OCR software earns its keep. Good OCR doesn’t just convert an image into text. It pulls useful data out of messy documents and makes it usable. For freelancers, that usually means faster expense capture. For small businesses, it means fewer admin gaps between receiving a document and recording it properly. For accountants and bookkeepers, it means fewer follow-up emails asking clients to resend legible copies or explain what a charge was for.

The problem is that most OCR roundups flatten everything into one category. They compare PDF editors, receipt scanners, and developer APIs as if they solve the same problem. They don’t. A sole trader forwarding receipts from WhatsApp needs something very different from a finance team batch-processing invoices or a developer building document extraction into an internal workflow.

This guide sorts the field by real use case. You’ll see tools that are strongest for receipts and expense capture, tools that are better for desktop PDF and archive work, and platforms that make more sense when you need an API and custom automation. If you’re still figuring out where OCR fits into your workflow, this overview of OCR for expense automation is a useful starting point.

Get the category right first. The shortlist gets much easier after that.

1. Snyp

Snyp is the tool I’d put first for people whose real problem isn’t “I need OCR”, but “I’m sick of receipts leaking out of every corner of the business”. That’s a different job. You don’t need another place to upload files manually. You need a capture system that fits how people already work.

That’s where Snyp is strongest. You can send documents through WhatsApp, forward them by email, or upload JPEG, PNG, and PDF files directly. Instead of stopping at text recognition, it extracts the details necessary for bookkeeping: merchant, amount, date, tax, currency, and category, then sends the result into Xero or QuickBooks for review and reconciliation.

Why it works for messy real life

A lot of freelancers and contractors don’t lose receipts because they’re disorganised. They lose them because capture happens at the wrong moment. You’re in a taxi, on site, between meetings, or clearing an inbox on your phone. If OCR only works when you sit down later and open a desktop app, compliance breaks down.

Snyp reduces that friction. Send it at the moment the receipt exists, then move on. That matters in the UK, where many small businesses are juggling expense admin alongside delivery work, client service, and tax obligations. The product is also priced for that market, starting from £19 per month, with a free trial and cancel-anytime approach.

“I can't deal with admin... I take a photo, send it to Snyp, and keep going,” says Tara Tan, Founding Partner at Strange Ventures.

Another practical strength is that it learns from corrections. If a merchant name or category needs fixing, the system uses that feedback to improve future extraction. That doesn’t make it magic, but it does make it more useful over time than a static scanner.

Best fit and trade-offs

Snyp makes the most sense for:

• Freelancers and sole traders: You need fast capture with very little process.
• Small businesses with receipt chaos: Staff send receipts from different channels, and you need one clean pipeline.
• Accountants using Xero or QuickBooks: The direct sync reduces chasing and rekeying.

A few limitations are worth being honest about:

• Accounting stack matters: If you use something other than Xero or QuickBooks, you may need extra steps.
• Edge cases still exist: Unusual or badly photographed receipts can still need a manual check.
• It’s purpose-built: If you want broad PDF redaction, legal comparison, or enterprise archive tooling, this isn’t that product.

For anyone evaluating receipt workflows, Snyp’s own guide on how to scan receipts properly is worth reading because capture quality still affects every OCR system downstream.

2. Adobe Acrobat Pro

A common small-business scenario looks like this: a client sends a signed PDF, a supplier emails a scanned invoice, and someone on the team needs to search, redact, comment on, and file the document before the day ends. Adobe Acrobat Pro fits that job better than a specialist OCR tool.

Acrobat earns its place when OCR is part of a wider PDF workflow. You are not just turning an image into text. You are also cleaning up files, combining pages, adding comments, locking documents down, and keeping records searchable. Adobe positions Acrobat as a document platform with built-in OCR, editing, redaction, accessibility tools, and workflow automation in its Acrobat feature documentation.

That distinction matters when choosing by use case. For freelancers dealing mainly with receipts, Acrobat is usually more software than they need. For accountants and small firms that live in PDFs, it can remove a lot of friction because the OCR step sits inside the same tool they already use to review and store documents.

Where Acrobat works best

In practice, Acrobat is strongest with clean business documents such as contracts, signed forms, letters, straightforward invoices, and archived PDFs that need to become searchable. The OCR is easy to run, and the post-OCR cleanup is better than in many lighter scanners. If a page is slightly crooked, split across files, or needs redaction before sharing, Acrobat handles the surrounding work without forcing you into another app.

I would put it in the desktop PDF category, not the receipt-capture category and not the developer API category.

That makes it a sensible fit for:

• Freelancers handling client paperwork: You need searchable PDFs, signatures, comments, and occasional OCR in one place.
• Small businesses with shared admin work: Staff regularly scan forms, supplier documents, and internal records that need filing and retrieval.
• Accountants and finance teams reviewing PDF source documents: You need readable archives, annotations, and document controls more than field-level data extraction.

If your process still starts with a scanner and piles of paper, Adobe also pairs reasonably well with a more automatic document scanning workflow before files reach your archive.

Trade-offs worth knowing

The trade-off is focus. Acrobat is good at many PDF tasks, but that breadth adds cost and complexity. Teams that only want invoice fields, receipt totals, or API output for downstream systems will usually get to value faster with a purpose-built extraction product.

It is also less forgiving than top OCR-first tools when layout reconstruction becomes the main requirement across messy source files. If you are dealing with mixed-language scans, difficult tables, or low-quality archive material all day, that is where dedicated OCR products tend to justify themselves.

So the decision framework is fairly simple. Choose Acrobat Pro if your primary problem is managing PDFs and OCR is one step inside that process. Skip it if your real problem is expense capture from phones, structured data extraction, or developer-led automation.

3. ABBYY FineReader PDF 16

A familiar scenario. You inherit a folder of supplier invoices, scanned contracts, and old PDFs from three different copiers, and half of them look like they were faxed through bad weather. ABBYY FineReader PDF 16 is the kind of desktop OCR tool that earns its keep in that mess.

Its strength is not just turning images into text. It does a better job than lighter OCR apps at keeping page structure intact when the source file is uneven, multilingual, table-heavy, or plain ugly. That matters for accountants, admin teams, and small firms digitising records, because clean text alone is not enough if the exported file still needs manual rebuilding.

Where ABBYY fits best

ABBYY makes the most sense in the document-first camp. Use it when the core job is to convert existing scans into searchable, editable files without losing too much of the original layout.

That usually points to three groups:

• Accountants and bookkeepers: Client paperwork often arrives as mixed-quality invoices, receipts, and statements. ABBYY handles that inconsistency better than basic PDF OCR.
• Small businesses digitising archives: Searchable PDF, PDF/A output, and batch processing are useful when old files need to become usable records.
• Freelancers and admin teams working with formatted documents: If contracts, reports, and forms need to stay readable after conversion, layout retention matters.

I would not put ABBYY in the same bucket as mobile-first receipt capture tools or developer APIs. It is a desktop product for people who work directly with documents.

What it does well in practice

ABBYY distinguishes itself most clearly when processing complex files. Invoices containing nested tables, receipts with tax lines positioned in corners, mixed-language pages, and scanned documents featuring stamps or handwritten notes represent the specific scenarios where ABBYY typically justifies its higher price.

Independent product material from ABBYY highlights broad language support, PDF conversion, document comparison, and OCR workflows aimed at business users, not just casual one-off scanning. You can review those capabilities in ABBYY's own FineReader PDF product documentation.

That mix is useful for accountants in particular. They often need to check what changed between document versions, keep files searchable for retrieval, and preserve enough formatting that a converted invoice still looks like an invoice.

One practical point. ABBYY is often easier to recommend for back-office cleanup than for front-end capture. If receipts are still arriving late, blurred, and from personal phones, improving the intake process with an automatic document scanner workflow may remove more manual work than upgrading the OCR engine alone.

Trade-offs worth knowing

ABBYY is rarely the cheapest option, and buying it is not always straightforward. Pricing can depend on reseller channels, and the Windows edition has historically been the fuller experience. For a solo freelancer with light OCR needs, that can feel like too much software.

There is also a workflow question. If your main goal is structured field extraction into accounting software, a purpose-built capture tool or API may get you there faster. ABBYY is stronger when a human still needs to review, compare, archive, and reuse the document itself.

So the decision framework is simple. Choose ABBYY FineReader PDF 16 if you need desktop OCR for difficult files and care about preserving layout across invoices, contracts, archive scans, and multilingual documents. Skip it if your priority is phone-based receipt capture, no-touch extraction, or developer-led automation.

4. Readiris PDF

Readiris PDF sits in a useful middle ground. It’s for buyers who want desktop OCR and some PDF management, but don’t want to commit to a heavy recurring subscription for every user. That’s the main appeal. A lot of small firms still prefer a one-time licence when the workload is steady but not huge.

In practice, Readiris handles the everyday jobs well. Convert scans into Word, Excel, or searchable PDF, merge and split files, compress oversized PDFs, and keep a fairly straightforward office document workflow moving without much ceremony.

Where it makes sense

Readiris is a sensible option when your OCR needs are predictable and your documents are fairly standard. Think admin teams converting letters, contracts, and reports, or small businesses that need occasional OCR without building a full document automation stack.

Its best qualities are practical:

• Perpetual licensing: Helpful if you want to avoid piling up monthly software bills.
• Lightweight workflow: Easier to get going with than some bigger suites.
• Basic PDF utilities included: Useful if you’d otherwise need a separate editor.

This is the sort of tool that works best when nobody wants to become an OCR specialist. Install it, process files, export them, move on.

Where stronger tools pull ahead

Readiris is less convincing when layouts get messy. That’s where ABBYY and Adobe tend to feel more polished. Complex tables, poor scan quality, and documents that need careful reconstruction are more likely to expose its limits.

Edition differences also matter. The feature set changes depending on which version you buy, so you need to confirm batch conversion, editing, and advanced functions before rolling it out. That’s not unusual, but it does trip people up.

Buy Readiris when you want decent desktop OCR with controlled cost. Don’t buy it expecting the strongest performance on difficult receipts, multilingual archives, or enterprise automation.

For a small office that wants “good enough and owned outright”, it remains a practical contender.

5. Tungsten OmniPage

OmniPage has been around long enough that many document teams know it by muscle memory. It’s now under Tungsten Automation, but the core appeal is familiar: high-volume OCR, strong layout retention, and deployment options that fit controlled enterprise environments better than app-led tools do.

This is not the product I’d hand to a sole trader who just wants to stop typing receipts. It’s the product I’d look at if a central IT or operations team needs standardised OCR workflows across departments, with server options and governance baked into the buying decision.

Why enterprises still consider it

OmniPage tends to appeal when document conversion is operational infrastructure, not an isolated task. Teams processing large volumes of forms, reports, or scanned records often care about centralised processing, permissions, connector options, and predictable rollout more than they care about a pretty interface.

Its strengths include:

• Enterprise deployment models: Better suited to central control.
• Server processing options: Helpful for shared workflows and scale.
• Established reputation: Many regulated environments still prefer proven tooling.

That said, the market around it has changed. Modern cloud OCR APIs and specialist IDP platforms are often easier to start with, especially if you don’t need on-prem style control.

The real trade-off

OmniPage’s challenge isn’t capability. It’s fit. For some organisations, a desktop or server OCR stack is exactly right. For others, it introduces more implementation overhead than the use case justifies.

The other issue is buying friction. Pricing is usually handled through quotes or resellers, which slows down comparison. Smaller firms often drop out at that point and choose something easier to trial.

If you already know you need governed document processing at scale, OmniPage deserves a place on the shortlist. If you’re still asking whether OCR should live in a PDF app, a receipt workflow, or an API, it’s probably too early to start here.

6. Google Cloud Document AI

Google Cloud Document AI is where the conversation shifts from “software you use” to “platform you build on”. If your team needs OCR inside a workflow, not just as a standalone document conversion step, Document AI becomes much more interesting.

It can return text with structure, bounding boxes, tables, and key-value pairs, and Google provides prebuilt processors for document types like invoices and receipts. That makes it useful for engineering teams building extraction pipelines into internal tools, approval workflows, or finance operations.

Strong choice for API-led projects

This is a good fit when you have developers and a clear automation target. You might be routing invoices into review queues, extracting line items for downstream systems, or pushing parsed documents into analytics and storage tools inside the wider Google Cloud environment.

What makes it attractive:

• Structured output: Better than plain OCR when you need fields and relationships.
• Prebuilt processors: Less ground-up work than starting with a generic OCR engine.
• Cloud scale: Useful for teams that expect processing volume to grow.

The practical reality is that Document AI isn’t a quick fix for non-technical users. Someone still needs to handle setup, authentication, document routing, error handling, and production monitoring. That’s normal for cloud OCR, but it’s why many small businesses overbuy when they choose API platforms too early.

One caution for receipt-heavy teams

Verified background data notes a gap in most OCR roundups: they often miss the harder problem of crumpled, low-light UK VAT receipts shot on phones, especially for sole traders and freelancers. The same verified material says open-source Tesseract can outperform cloud services like Google Cloud Vision on low-resolution receipts in certain UK trials when paired with preprocessing, although that route requires developer tuning and isn’t suited to non-technical users, as summarised in this discussion of OCR tool gaps.

That doesn’t make Document AI weak. It just means generic cloud OCR isn’t automatically the best answer for every receipt scenario. If your source documents are chaotic mobile photos, test with your own samples before committing.

7. Microsoft Azure AI Document Intelligence

Azure AI Document Intelligence is usually the cleanest API choice for teams already invested in Microsoft. The product structure is sensible. You’ve got a Read model for OCR, a Layout model for structure, and prebuilt models for invoices, receipts, IDs, and related document types.

That separation matters. It helps teams avoid using a heavyweight model when they only need text extraction, and it makes architecture decisions clearer when documents move through different stages of validation and review.

Best for Microsoft-first environments

If your business already lives in Azure, this service is easier to justify than a greenfield cloud OCR option. Identity, logging, security controls, and adjacent services are already there. That reduces the integration friction that often turns good OCR into a messy internal project.

Azure is especially useful for:

• Enterprise developers: Building extraction into business systems.
• Operations teams with IT support: Standardising document processing under Microsoft governance.
• Hybrid environments: Using SDKs, REST APIs, or containers where cloud-only deployment isn’t ideal.

One of its more practical strengths is the ability to train custom models when prebuilt extraction doesn’t match the documents you receive. For repeated internal forms, that can be a better route than trying to force a generic parser to fit.

Where teams misjudge it

Azure Document Intelligence isn’t hard because the OCR is hard. It’s hard because production use adds the usual platform work: quotas, monitoring, retries, document routing, and handling edge cases gracefully. If you don’t already have Azure skills in-house, the ramp-up can be steeper than buyers expect.

It’s also not the best first step for very small firms. A freelancer or bookkeeper doesn’t need a cloud document service to process daily receipts. They need less setup and more flow.

For larger businesses standardising document extraction across finance, operations, and customer workflows, though, Azure is one of the most coherent options available.

8. Amazon Textract

Amazon Textract is one of the better fits for finance-heavy automation because it doesn’t stop at raw text. It can extract printed and handwritten text, analyse forms and tables, and use purpose-built APIs for expenses, IDs, and lending documents.

That matters for back-office teams. Plain OCR gives you words. Textract’s domain-specific endpoints aim to give you document meaning in a format you can route, validate, and act on.

Where Textract stands out

Textract is most compelling when you’re processing invoices, receipts, or structured forms at scale inside AWS. Teams already using S3, Lambda, Step Functions, and downstream data services can build a fairly clean automation pipeline around it.

Its strongest use cases tend to include:

• Accounts payable workflows: Pulling data from invoices and expense documents.
• Document-heavy finance operations: Routing extracted fields into approvals or ledgers.
• Large processing volumes: Using synchronous and asynchronous modes depending on workload.

The best OCR software for developers usually isn’t the one with the nicest interface. It’s the one that returns the right fields and fails predictably when documents get messy.

That’s the right mental model for Textract. It’s infrastructure.

What to watch before rollout

Pricing varies by API, and more specialised analysis costs more than plain text detection. That’s common in cloud OCR, but it means you need a realistic test set before estimating cost and throughput.

Quality is also still tied to scan quality. A badly cropped, shadowed, or angled receipt can force extra post-processing or manual review. No cloud OCR platform escapes that. The mistake teams make is assuming the model will compensate for poor capture discipline.

If your developers are already in AWS and the target is expense or invoice automation, Textract is one of the more natural starting points on this list.

9. Nanonets OCR

Nanonets sits between raw OCR APIs and full custom machine learning work. That’s its appeal. You get OCR plus document workflows, prebuilt models for common document types, confidence scoring, and the ability to train models without taking on a full ML engineering project.

For operations and finance teams, that can be a sweet spot. You’re not just recognising text. You’re building a review loop around extraction quality.

Why some teams prefer it to raw cloud OCR

The main advantage is speed to value. With Nanonets, teams can move from sample documents to a working extraction workflow faster than they usually can with a lower-level platform. You also get tools for validation and confidence-driven review, which makes it easier to catch bad extractions before they reach accounting systems.

That tends to work well for:

• Finance operations teams: Automating invoice and receipt intake.
• SMBs with some technical support: Wanting more than a scanner, less than a custom platform.
• Workflow-focused teams: Needing approvals and QA around extracted data.

If your goal is structured field extraction rather than simple text conversion, that’s the right lens. Snyp explains this difference clearly in its overview of AI extraction for receipts and documents.

The trade-off is platform dependency

The more heavily you rely on proprietary models and workflows, the more switching cost you create later. That doesn’t mean Nanonets is a bad choice. It just means the convenience is part of the product, and convenience always has some lock-in attached.

Costs also need modelling carefully because operation-based pricing can look straightforward early on and become less intuitive as workflows grow. That’s especially true when different teams begin using the platform for different document types.

Nanonets is a strong contender when you want intelligent document processing without building everything from scratch. It’s less attractive if your priority is absolute control over infrastructure or a fully open, self-hosted stack.

10. Tesseract OCR

Tesseract is the answer when cost control, privacy, and flexibility matter more than convenience. It’s open source, widely used, and perfectly capable in the right hands. But it is not a turnkey product. That distinction matters.

If you can preprocess images properly, script workflows, and handle post-extraction logic yourself, Tesseract can be excellent. If you want something a non-technical team can pick up tomorrow, it’s the wrong tool.

Where Tesseract shines

Tesseract works well in self-hosted pipelines, especially when data can’t leave your environment or when per-page cloud costs don’t make sense. It supports many languages through trained data files and has a large ecosystem of wrappers and integrations.

Its practical strengths are clear:

• No per-page fees: Useful for sustained internal processing.
• Offline deployment: Important for privacy-sensitive workflows.
• Developer control: You choose the preprocessing, orchestration, and downstream logic.

The catch is that OCR quality depends heavily on what you do before recognition. Deskewing, denoising, contrast adjustment, cropping, and image cleanup often matter as much as the OCR engine itself.

Why developers still choose it

Tesseract gives teams control that commercial tools don’t. You can tune it, containerise it, combine it with OpenCV, and build for highly specific document conditions. That’s why it remains relevant even with so many cloud OCR products on the market.

The verified material behind this article also points out that Tesseract can excel on difficult low-resolution receipt scenarios when paired with preprocessing, though that requires developer effort rather than being available out of the box. That’s the core trade-off in one sentence.

Use Tesseract if you want an engine. Don’t use it if you want a finished workflow.

For engineering-led teams, it’s still one of the most important OCR tools to know.

Top 10 OCR Software Comparison

Product	Core features	Quality (★)	Value & Pricing (💰)	Target audience (👥)	Unique selling points (✨)
Snyp 🏆	AI receipt capture via WhatsApp / email / upload; extracts merchant/amount/date/tax; Xero & QuickBooks sync	★★★★	💰 From £19/mo · free trial · cancel anytime	👥 Freelancers, SMBs, accountants	✨ Context-aware extraction; set‑and‑forget workflow; multi‑channel capture
Adobe Acrobat Pro	Full PDF workflow: OCR, batch actions, redaction, accessibility	★★★★	💰 Subscription (Pro) · free trial	👥 Power users, compliance teams, enterprises	✨ Deep PDF tooling; indexing & accessibility features
ABBYY FineReader PDF 16	AI OCR with layout retention, multi‑language, batch PDF/A workflows	★★★★★	💰 License/subscription (reseller pricing)	👥 Legal, publishing, archiving, enterprises	✨ Best‑in‑class recognition & table handling
Readiris PDF (I.R.I.S.)	OCR → Word/Excel/searchable PDF; merge/split/compress; multiple editions	★★★	💰 One‑time license options · edition‑based pricing	👥 SMBs wanting perpetual license	✨ Perpetual licensing; lightweight PDF tools
Tungsten OmniPage	High‑accuracy OCR; server edition; SDKs/connectors for enterprise capture	★★★★★	💰 Enterprise pricing (quote)	👥 Large enterprises, central IT	✨ Scalable server processing & integrations
Google Cloud Document AI	Cloud OCR + prebuilt processors (invoices/receipts); table & KV extraction	★★★★★	💰 Pay‑as‑you‑go per processor	👥 Developers, ML/data teams	✨ Specialized processors and Google Cloud stack
Microsoft Azure AI Document Intelligence	Read/Layout models, prebuilt receipt/invoice models, SDKs & containers	★★★★★	💰 Pay‑as‑you‑go (Azure billing)	👥 Azure customers, enterprises, dev teams	✨ Container/on‑prem options; Azure integration
Amazon Textract	Managed OCR with AnalyzeExpense/AnalyzeID; tables/forms extraction	★★★★	💰 Pay‑as‑you‑go by API (varies by feature)	👥 AWS users, finance/back‑office teams	✨ Expense & ID‑specific APIs for finance automation
Nanonets OCR	IDP platform with prebuilt models, custom training, connectors & workflows	★★★★	💰 Usage/operations‑based pricing	👥 Ops/finance teams, non‑ML teams	✨ Fast model training without heavy MLOps; workflows
Tesseract OCR	Open‑source OCR engine; command‑line, >100 languages, offline deployment	★★★	💰 Free (open source); self‑host costs only	👥 Developers, privacy‑focused teams	✨ Free, offline, full control; needs preprocessing

Beyond Text Turn Your Documents into Data

The best OCR software depends less on a headline feature list and more on where the document friction starts. That’s the decision most buyers skip. They compare recognition claims before they decide whether the problem is capture, PDF handling, or workflow automation.

If you’re a freelancer, sole trader, or field-based contractor, the biggest bottleneck usually happens at the point of capture. Receipts arrive when you’re moving, not when you’re at a desk. In that situation, a tool like Snyp makes more sense than a heavyweight OCR suite because it reduces the chance that documents go missing before they ever reach the books. That matters in a UK environment where verified background data notes widespread digitisation challenges among sole traders and small businesses, especially on mobile-captured receipts tied to MTD compliance pressures, as described in the earlier cited analysis.

If you run a small business with a steady stream of PDFs, signed forms, and scanned documents, desktop tools still have a place. Adobe Acrobat Pro is often the practical choice when your team lives in PDFs and needs OCR plus editing, redaction, search, and accessibility. ABBYY FineReader PDF 16 is often the better fit when scan quality is mixed and layout retention matters. Readiris can work well when you want something lighter and would rather avoid another recurring subscription.

For larger organisations, the choice usually shifts from “which app should we buy?” to “which platform fits our stack?” Google Cloud Document AI, Azure AI Document Intelligence, and Amazon Textract all make sense when developers need OCR as part of a system, not a standalone task. Nanonets is useful when you want more workflow support and less low-level engineering. Tesseract remains the right call when you want open-source control and can handle the technical work that commercial tools abstract away.

A simple way to decide is to ask three questions.

• Where do documents enter the process: Phone, email, scanner, shared inbox, or backend system?
• What output do you need: Searchable text, a clean PDF, or structured fields ready for accounting or automation?
• Who owns the workflow: End users, finance staff, or developers?

Those answers narrow the field faster than any feature checklist. If staff need to submit receipts without friction, choose a capture-first tool. If the output must remain a polished document, choose a desktop PDF suite. If OCR needs to feed internal systems, choose an API platform. And if your team wants total control over the pipeline, pick an open-source engine and plan for the engineering work upfront.

One final point. Don’t buy OCR based on ideal sample files. Test it on your worst documents. Use crumpled receipts, skewed mobile photos, supplier PDFs with odd tables, and the files clients send at quarter end. OCR decisions look very different when you test against reality instead of marketing screenshots.

That’s what separates software that looks good in a demo from software that effectively removes admin from your week.

---

If receipt admin keeps slipping through the cracks, Snyp is the easiest place to start. You can send receipts through WhatsApp, email, or file upload, let the system extract the details that matter, and push the result into Xero or QuickBooks without building a new process around it.